Issue №: 2 (60)
The journal deals with the issues of efficiency of functioning of the national economics and organizational forms of management of the national economy. Attention is paid to the problems of marketing, management and efficiency of production and economic activity of agrarian enterprises. The issues of public administration and administration, accounting and taxation, banking and insurance, forecasting and modeling of economic processes, foreign economic activity, commodity flows of economic entities and their infrastructure support.
CONCEPTUAL AND TERMINOLOGICAL APPARATUS OF ECOLOGICALLY ORIENTED ECONOMY
TARASOVA Oksana – Postgraduate Student of the First Year of the Study of the Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, 3, Soniachna Str., e-mail: sosuresosure@ukr.net).
The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and applied research in the field of ecologically oriented economy as a basis for achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. It is established that the term «eco-oriented economy» occurs in various spheres of life and has many uses in combination with other concepts.
The priority topics of ecologically oriented economy, which were proposed by scientists in different time periods of studying this topic, are analyzed and systematized. The main differences between the concepts of «green» economy and «bioeconomy», «environmental economy» and «eco-oriented economy» are identified. It has been proven that green growth focuses on two of the three basic principles of sustainable development (economic and environmental) and is one of the components of sustainable development. The social dimension is realized through green growth initiatives that can help social benefits. Aspects of system ecology in the process of solving existing economic and environmental problems, which should be the driving stages of greening the economy, are considered.
It was declared that the «green» economy does not replace sustainable development, it is seen as its component, as a more pragmatic approach to balancing the three components. However, «low-carbon» development is interpreted in the scientific work as a process of separating economic growth from the growth of energy consumption, through technological innovation, changes in infrastructure and behavior of economic entities. It is established that the value of natural resources as an economic activity depends not only on the amount of income, but also on the amount of well-being that it can increase or decrease in the long run.
A comparative analysis of the eco-oriented economy with the traditional economy and ecology was carried out in such categories as the prevailing scientific approach; defining driving forces; relationship structure; type of the system; spatial boundaries; a period of time; the main objective; principles; efficiency criterion; assessment of technical progress; basic technologies; involved generations. General interpretation of the definition of «eco-oriented economy» is formed, is an interdisciplinary category that includes components of nature and economy, containing economic systems in terms of time, space and individual components.
1. Pearce, D. (2002). An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27, 57-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083429 [in English].
2. Friedman, T.L. (2008). Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution – and How It Can Renew America. New York: «Farrar, Straus, and Giroux» [in English].
3. Newton, A., & Cantarello, E. (2014). An Introduction to the Green Economy: Science, Systems and Sustainability. London: Routledge [in English].
4. Levidow, L. (2018). Green economy. Companion to Environmental Studies. London: Routledge, 199-204 [in English].
5. Ayres, R.U., & Kneese, A.V. (1969). Production, consumption and externalities. American Economic Review, 59, P. 282-296 [in English].
6. Mateos, A. (2016). The Concept of an Environmentally Oriented Economy: Genesis and Current State. Economic sciences,145, 63-67 [in English].
7. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R. et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 [in English].
8. Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan [in English].
9. International Energy Agency. Key World Energy Statistics (2012). Paris: OECD [in English].
10. Cato, M.S. (2009). Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice. London: Earthscan [in English].
11. Boulding K. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. Retrieved from: http://arachnid.biosci.utexas.edu/courses/thoc/readings/boulding_spaceship earth.pdf [in English].
12. Fedyna, S. (2019). Formuvannia systemy indykatoriv staloho rozvytku dlia otsiniuvannia biosotsialnoi ekonomiky [Formation of a system of indicators of sustainable development for assessment of biosocial economy]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky» – International Scientific Journal «Mechanism of Economy Regulation», 4, 129-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mer.2019.86.13 [in Ukrainian].
13. Ihnatchenko, A.S., Kovalov, B.L., Fedyna, S.M., & Popova A.H. (2020). Analiz definitsiinoi osnovy termina «ekolohichni (zeleni) investytsii» ta yikh klasyfikatsiia [Analysis of the definitional basis of the term «ecological (green) investments» and their classification]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky» – International Scientific Journal «Mechanism of Economy Regulation», 2, 138-148. DOI: https://doі.org/10.21272/mer.2020.88.12 [in Ukrainian].
14. The Green Investment Report (2013). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from: www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GreenInvestmentReport_ExecutiveSummary_ 2013 [in English].
15. Green Investment (2018). World Green Economy Council. Retrieved from: http://wgeco.org/green-investment/ [in English].
16. Danish Organisation for Renewable Energy. Retrieved from: http://www.ove.org [in English].
17. United Nations (UN). Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/ru/ [in English].
18. Markevych, K., & Sidenko, V. (2019). «Zeleni» investytsii u stalomu rozvytku: svitovyi dosvid [«Green» investments in sustainable development: world experience]. Retrieved from: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2019_ ZELEN_INVEST.pdf [in Ukrainian].
19. Honcharuk, I.V., & Tomashuk, I.V. (2017). Vplyv ekoloho-ekonomichnoho faktoru na osoblyvosti orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu vykorystannia resursnoho potentsialu silskykh terytorii [The influence of the ecological and economic factor on the peculiarities of the organizational and economic mechanism of using the resource potential of rural areas]. Ekonomika, finansy, menedzhment: aktualni pytannia nauky i praktyky – Economics, finance, management: topical issues of science and practical activity, 4 (20), 52-62 [in Ukrainian].
20. Honcharuk, I.V. (2013). Pidpryiemnytska diialnist vyrobnytstva biopalyva yak sfera rozvytku «zelenoho biznesu» [Business activity of biofuel production as a field of «green business» development]. Ekonomichnyi forum – Economic Forum, 4, 93-97 [in Ukrainian].
21. Honcharuk, I.V. (2013). «Zelenyi biznes» u kontseptsii staloho rozvytku suspilstva [«Green business» in the concept of sustainable development of society]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu – Collection of scientific works of the Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, 2 (77), 1, 137-145 [in Ukrainian].
22. Honcharuk, T.V. (2013). Kontseptsiia «zelenoi ekonomiky» u zabezpechenni staloho rozvytku suspilstva [The concept of «green economy» in ensuring the sustainable development of society]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomichni nauky – Collection of Scientific Works of the Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Economic Sciences Series, 2 (77), 157-166 [in Ukrainian].
23. Tokarchuk, D. (2022). Development of territorial communities as the main purpose of reforming local government: issues of planning and the «green» course. Scientific and practical principles of development of territorial communities in the conditions of decentralization of power: monograph. Primedia eLaunch, Boston, USA. DOI: 10.46299/979-8-88680-820-9.8 [in English].
24. Kaletnik, G.M., & Pryshliak, N.V. (2021). Rozvytok haluzi biopalyv yak determinanta staloho rozvytku Ukrainy [Development of the biofuel industry as a determinant of sustainable development of Ukraine]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovo-vyrobnychyi zhurnal «Ekonomika APK» – International Research and Production Journal «Economics of agro-industrial complex», 2, 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202102071 [in Ukrainian].
25. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977). Inequality, Limits and Growth from a Bioeconomic Viewpoint». Review of Social Economy, 35, 3, 361-375 [in English].
26. Brockington, D. (2012). Radically conservative vision? The challenge of UNEP’s «Towards a Green Economy». Development and Change, 43, 1, 409-422 [in English].
27. Віna, O., & Camera, F. (2011). Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the «double crisis». Ecological Economics, 70, 12, 2308-2316 [in English].
28. Victor, P., & Jackson, T. (2012). Commentary: a commentary on UNEP’s green economy scenarios. Ecological Economics, 77, 11-15 [in English].
About the journal
С1 Economics and International Economic Relations (by specialization)
D1 Accounting and Taxation
D2 Finance, Banking, Insurance and Stock Market
D3 Management
D4 Public Management and Administration
D5 Marketing
D7 Trade
J3 Tourism and Recreation
Founded in 1997 under the name ”Bulletin of Vinnytsia State Agricultural Institute”. In 2010-2014 it was published under the name “Collection of Scientific Papers of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University”. Since 2015 “Economics, finance, management: current issues of science and practical activity” (Certificate of State Registration of Mass Media No. 21154-10954 PR dated 12/31/2014).
