Issue №: 4 (58)
The journal deals with the issues of efficiency of functioning of the national economics and organizational forms of management of the national economy. Attention is paid to the problems of marketing, management and efficiency of production and economic activity of agrarian enterprises. The issues of public administration and administration, accounting and taxation, banking and insurance, forecasting and modeling of economic processes, foreign economic activity, commodity flows of economic entities and their infrastructure support.
UKRAINIAN LAND MARKET MODEL – EXCLUSIVE OR «HYBRID» OF THE LATIFUNDIST MODEL?
ZAKHARCHENKO Volodymyr – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the Department of Administrative Management and Alternative Energy Sources, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, 3, Soniachna Str., e-mail: zakharchenkovn@i.ua).
The article considers topical issues of land reform in Ukraine in the context of the introduction of the Ukrainian model of the agricultural land market (AL). The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the official and author's models of the market turnover of ALs in order to increase the strengths and neutralize the weaknesses of the first of them and turn it into an exclusive model, rather than a copy of the worst variants of the baseline models. It is shown that the state model, which is practiced in Israel, China and other countries, is based on lease land relations - between the state, as the owner of the land, and collective agricultural enterprises, and these relations are regulated by the state land authority. It is determined that the farming model, as the most common and effective, has in its basis a private form of ownership of land, which is cultivated mainly by small and medium farms, and lease land relations are complemented by the market. And these relations, as in Poland, are regulated by state and self-governing bodies. It has been established that the latifundist model of the AL market is also based on private ownership of land, but the main market entities are not farms, but agricultural holdings. Within the framework of this model, land relations between the market entities are oriented mainly on land grabbing and are usually regulated by the general competence authorities. In general, this model is the most threatening to the food security of many countries where it is practiced, such as Madagascar, and the sustainable development of their rural areas. It is justified that the Ukrainian model of the AL market from July 21, 2021 to January 1, 2024 will have many signs of a farming model. But since then, it should not become a «hybrid» of the latifundist, but a combined version of the farm and state models. At the same time, the emphasis should be placed not on the privatization of land, but on their effective use, based on the advantages of the lease form of the land circulation, which are associated with the introduction of long-term lease, increasing its price and transferring to the electronic form.
1. Kaletnik, G.M., Kozlovskyi, S.V., & Tsikhanovska, V.M. (2012). Perspektyvy rozavytku zemelnykh vidnosyn ta rynku zemli v Ukraini [Prospects of land relations and land market in Ukraine]. Ahrosvit – Agrosvit world, 12,2-6 [in Ukrainian].
2. Levek, R., Khodakivska, O.V., & Yurchenko, I.V. (2017). Modeli rehuliuvannia rynkovoho obihu zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia v krainakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Models of regulation of market turnover of agricultural land in the countries of the European Union]. Ekonomika APK – Economy of Agro-industrial complex, 10, 5-12 [in Ukrainian].
3. Khodakivska, O.V., & Yurchenko, I.V. (2019). Rynkovyi obih zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia v Izraili [Market turnover of agricultural land in Israel]. Ekonomika APK – Economy of Agro-industrial complex, 2, 84-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201902084 [in Ukrainian].
4. Sheludko, R.M., & Hoptsii, D.O. (2019). Rehuliuvannia obihu zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia: poshuk ukrainskoi modeli [Regulation of agricultural land turnover: search for the Ukrainian model]. Ukrainskyy zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky ta texniky – Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Techniques, 4, 41-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2019-4-5 [in Ukrainian].
5. Petruk, O.V. (2016). Reformuvannia zemelnykh vidnosyn u Kytai ta Vietnami: dosvid dlia Ukrainy [Land reform in China and Vietnam: experience for Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Actual problems of public administration, 1, 196-202 [in Ukrainian].
6. Myhdal, O. (2017). Zemelna reforma – osnovni aktsenty [Land reform – main accents]. Vzglyad yurista: yuridicheskij blog kompanii Jurimex – View of a lawyer: legal blog of Jurimex. Retrieved from: http://jurblog.com.ua/2017/08/zemelna-reforma-osnovni-aktsenti/ [in Ukrainian].
7. Lomakovych, V., Unkovska, T., Ilchenko, V., & Bohdan, T. Rynok zemli: isnuiuchi zahrozy dlia Ukrainy ta neobkhidni zapobizhnyky [Land market: existing threats to Ukraine and necessary fuses]. growford.org.ua. Retrieved from: https://www.growford.org.ua/research/analitychna-dopovid-rynok-zemli-isnuyuchi-zagrozy-dlya-ukrayiny-ta-neobhidni-zapobizhnyky/ [in Ukrainian].
8. Lenin, V.I. (1972). Imperializm i rozkol sotsializmu [Imperialism and the Split of Socialism]. Complete works. T. 30. Kyiv: Politvydav Ukrainy (pp. 32-34) [in Ukrainian].
9. Stadvell, D. (2013). Aziatskaya model upravleniya: Udachi i provaly samogo dinamichnogo regiona v mire [Asian management model: Good luck and failures of the most dynamic region in the world]. Moskva: Alpina Didzhital. Retrieved from: https://monster-book.com/download_link/18197 [in Russian].
10. Belarusskiy prezident raskritikoval zemelnuyu reformu v Ukraine [The Belarusian president criticized the land reform in Ukraine] (2020). ukrrudprom. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrrudprom.com/news/Belaruskiy_prezident_ raskritikoval_zemelnuyu_reformu_v_Ukraine.html [in Russian].
11. Kushch, A. (2017). Zemelnyy vopros. Kabmin reshil nachat reformu s sobstvennogo ogoroda [The Cabinet of Ministers decided to start reform from its own garden]. Delovaya stolitsa – Business capital. Retrieved from: http://www.dsnews.ua/economics/zemelnyy-vopros-pochemu-u-ukrainy-nepoluchaetsya- navesti-08062017220000 [in Russian].
12. Heiets, V.M. (2009). Suspilstvo, derzhava, ekonomika: fenomenolohiia vzaiemodii ta rozvytku [Society, state, economy: phenomenology of interaction and development]. Kyiv: Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
13. Vernivskiy, P. (2020). Otkryv rynok zemli. My teper ne Venesuela i Severnaya Koreya. My teper Zimbabve i Zambiya [Having opened the land market, we are now not Venezuela and North Korea. We are Zimbabwe and Zambia now]. ua24. Retrieved from: https://ua24ua.net/otkriv-rinok-zemli-mi-teper-ne-venesuela-i-severnaya-koreya-mi-teper-zimbabve-i-zambiya/ [in Russian].
14. Mohylnyi, O.M. (2018). Derzhavne rehuliuvannia orendnykh zemelnykh vidnosyn: politekonomichnyi pidkhid [State regulation of lease land relations: political economic approach]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, 5. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua [in Ukrainian].
15. Silhospzemlia v Ukraini podorozhchala: nazvano rehion iz naistrimkishym zrostanniam [Agricultural land in Ukraine has risen in price: the region with the fastest growth is named] (2021). Agroportal. Retrieved from: http://agroportal.ua/news/ukraina/selkhozzemlya-v-ukraine-podorozhala-nazvan-region-s-samym-stremitelnym-rostom/ [in Russian].
16. Malyi, I.Y., & Zahrebelna, K.V. (2012). Upravlinnia zemelnymy resursamy Ukrainy: mynule ta maibutnie [Land management of Ukraine: past and future]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the state, 3, 28-33. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2020.3.28 [in Ukrainian].
17. Pronina, O.V. (2014). Rehuliuvannia zemelnykh vidnosyn na prykladi zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Regulation of land relations on the example of foreign experience]. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia i mistsevoho samovriaduvannia – Theory and practice of public administration and local self-government, 1. Retrieved from: http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2014_1/20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Kapelyushnikov, R.I. (2007). Novaya ataka na teoremu Kouza: preprint WP3/2007/01 [A new attack on the Cowes theorem: preprint WP3/2007/01]. Moskva: GU VShE [in Russian].
19. Yurchenko, E. (2021). Perspektyvy rynku zemli: khto v zoni ryzyku [Prospects of the land market: who is at risk]. yur-gazeta. Retrieved from: https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/perspektivi-rinku-zemli-hto-v-zoni-riziku.html [in Ukrainian].
20. Yurchenko, E. (2021). Tsina na zemliu: shcho ochikuvaty z 1 lypnia [Land price: what to expect from July 1]. epravda. Retrieved from: https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2021/06/28/675386/ [in Ukrainian].
21. «SETAM» z oseni mynuloho roku prodalo prava orendy zemli na 32 mln hrn [Since the autumn of last year, SETAM has sold the rights to lease land for 32 million UAH] (2019). interfax. Retrieved from: https://ua.interfax.com.ua/news/economic/563955.html [in Ukrainian].
About the journal
С1 Economics and International Economic Relations (by specialization)
D1 Accounting and Taxation
D2 Finance, Banking, Insurance and Stock Market
D3 Management
D4 Public Management and Administration
D5 Marketing
D7 Trade
J3 Tourism and Recreation
Founded in 1997 under the name ”Bulletin of Vinnytsia State Agricultural Institute”. In 2010-2014 it was published under the name “Collection of Scientific Papers of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University”. Since 2015 “Economics, finance, management: current issues of science and practical activity” (Certificate of State Registration of Mass Media No. 21154-10954 PR dated 12/31/2014).
