Economy, finances, management: topical issues of science and practical activity

HONCHARUK Inna – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Vice-Rector for Scientific and Pedagogical, Scientific and Innovative Activities, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, 3, Soniachna Str., e-mail: vnaunauka2021@gmail.com).

KRASNOSELSKA Anastasiia – Postgraduate Student of the Second Year of Study of the Department of Economicsand Entrepreneurship, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, 3, Soniachna Str., e-mail: akrasnoselska09@gmail.com )

The article examines environmentalization as continuous introduction of new technique and technologies for a production and modern forms of organization of labour. Introduction of new principles in to the system of the balanced development of Ukraine are basic tasks that is sent to provide of ecological constituent of industries of economy. It is marked that on the whole in a public policy tasks stand about reduction to the booty of natural resources for the use in a national economy, reduction of accumulation of contaminating wastes at the production of different types of products and separately each and general production on the whole. It is marked that an ecologization of industries of economy is an important constituent in their competitiveness and to compatibility with the basic terms of rational of nature management. Certainly, that beginning of ecologization of productive process is potential of increase of production volumes, where maintenance is and comes true passing to the speed-up increase of quality indexes of environmental preservation. It is marked the result of it, that in resource return come forward as basic quality ecological and economic indexes, ecological efficiency of economy, ecologization, ecofriendlyness, that in the future will become a base during realization of certain chart of management of operations. Essence of ecologization is considered from positions of the small and scale understanding. It is distinguished, that to the in the first case the ecologization – it is development and introduction of principles in relation to technical replacement; substituting by new technologies and organizations of labour, as a result they show up in the reduction of contamination of environment or in his renewal. In second case the ecologization – it is changes in a technique, to productive technology and in a production, that diminish the expenses of resources of natural environment in a count on unit of mine-out products or rendered service of corresponding quality. It is educed that as definition «ecologization» has changed in time and in accordance with the stages of ecologization in the context of world development. Materials of conferences of steady development are considered United Nations are on questions an environment. Materials of conference of the UNO are analyzed on questions the change of climate, where during two weeks discussed further steps for limitation of raising of middle global temperature within the framework of the Parisian agreement. It is indicated that at participating of Ukraine in a conference it was announced establishment of two initiatives: the Global platform for the estimation of losses to the environment and climate on that wars and initiatives influence in relation to creation of the «Green grain-growing corridors». The brought possible amount over of extrass of greenhouse gases, that get in an atmosphere in the consequence of an increase amount of fires through the conduct of battle actions and moving of people in the safe regions of country. The brought possible amount over of extras of greenhouse gases as a result of battle actions, that take place as a result of an increase amount of fires and moving of people in the safe regions of the country.

The important achievement of Ukraine is marked in relation to prohibition of possibility of including to the national reports by the country-aggressor of extras of greenhouse gases from territories, that today is temporally occupied. Reasonably, that eurointegration motion is key at proceeding in Ukraine and characterizes the increase of meaningfulness of Nationally certain payment (farther – NCP).

1. Burliai, A.P., & Burliai, O.L. (2012). Analiz zastosuvannia ekonomichnykh instrumentiv ekolohichnoi polityky v Cherkaskii oblasti [Analysis of the application of economic instruments of environmental policy in the Cherkasy region]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva – Collection of scientific works of the Uman National University of Horticulture, 78, 240-251 [in Ukrainian].

2. Hafurova, O.V. (2017). Rozvytok naukovykh pidkhodiv shchodo ekolohizatsii ahrarnoho zakonodavstva [Development of scientific approaches to environmentalization of agrarian legislation]. Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Vid pravovoi okhorony pryrody URSR do ekolohichnoho prava Ukrainy» – All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference «From legal nature protection of the Ukrainian SSR to environmental law of Ukraine». (pp. 77-82). Kyiv: KNU im. T. Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].

3. Honcharuk, I.V., Kovalchuk, S.Ya., Tsytsiura, Ya.H., & Lutkovska, S.M. (2020). Dynamichni protsesy rozvytku orhanichnoho vyrobnytstva v Ukraini [Dynamic processes of development of organic production in Ukraine]. Vinnytsia: TOV «Tvory» [in Ukrainian].

4. Ilchuk, V.P., & Shtyrkhun, Kh.I. (2016). Orhanichne vyrobnytstvo yak priorytetnyi napriam rozvytku ahrarnoho sektora natsionalnoi ekonomiky [Organic production as a priority direction for the development of the agrarian sector of the national economy]. Naukovyi visnyk Polissia – Polissya scientific bulletin, 1 (5), 14-22 [in Ukrainian].

5. Kaletnik, G.M., & Lutkovska, S.M. (2020). Struktura finansuvannia ta monitorynhu zakhodiv zabezpechennia ekolohichnoi bezpeky [The structure of financing and monitoring measures to ensure environmental safety]. Ahrosvit – Agroworld, 9, 10-19. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2020.9.10 [in Ukrainian].

6. Kaminskyi, V.F., Saiko, V.F., Shevchenko, I.P. et al. (2012). Suchasni systemy zemlerobstva i tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur [Modern systems of farming and technologies for growing agricultural crops]. Kyiv: VP «Edelveis» [in Ukrainian].

7. Krutiakova, V.I., & Kharichkov, S.K. (2013). Ekolohizatsiia yak skladova stratehii perekhodu Ukrainy do staloho rozvytku [Greening as a component of Ukraine’s transition strategy to sustainable development]. Mizhnarodna konferentsiya «Tsili zbalansovanoho rozvytku dlia Ukrainy» – International Conference «Goals of balanced development for Ukraine». (pp. 280-286). Kyiv: Tsentr ekolohichnoi osvity ta informatsii [in Ukrainian].

8. Pohrishchuk, B.V., & Pohrishchuk, H.B. (2011). Ekoloho-ekonomichna paradyhma suchasnoho rozvytku silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva [Ecological and economic paradigm of modern development of agricultural production]. Ahrosvit – Agroworld, 9, 8-11 [in Ukrainian].

9. Pohrishchuk, B.V., & Pohrishchuk, H.B. (2016). Pryrodno-resursne zabezpechennia innovatsiino-oriientovanoho rozvytku ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky [Natural resource provision of innovation-oriented development of the agrarian sector of the economy]. Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Ternopil National Economic University, 4, 7-17 [in Ukrainian].

10. Sukhanova, Ye.T. (2002). Ekonomichni aspekty ekolohizatsii rozvytku prodovolchoho kompleksu rehionu [Economic aspects of greening the development of the food complex of the region]. Irpin: Akademiia DPS Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

11. Tarasova, V.V. (2008). Ekolohichna statystyka [Ecological statistics]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].

12. Kharychkov, S.K., Andrieieva, N.N., & Kupynets, L.E. (2007). Ekonomika ta ekolohiia: sumisnist rozvytku (svitovyi dosvid ta ukrainska perspektyva) [Economy and ecology: compatibility of development (world experience and Ukrainian perspective)]. Odesa: IPREEI NAN Ukrainy

13. Tsili staloho rozvytku: Ukraina. Lypen [Goals of sustainable development: Ukraine. July]. un.org.ua. Retrieved from: http:www.un.org.ua/images/ 2016_SDGs_Ukraine_expert_opinion_ukr.pdf. 2016 rik [in Ukrainian].

14. Poriadok dii «Poriadok dennyi na XXI stolittia» («Agenda 21») [The order of actions «Agenda for the XXI century» («Agenda 21»)]. (2000). Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Intelsfera» [in Ukrainian].

15. Shchorichnyi samit OON z pytan zminy klimatu COP27 [Annual UN Climate Change Summit COP27]. armyinform.com.ua. Retrieved from: https://armyinform.com.ua/2022/11/06/u-yegypti-rozpochalasya-klimatychna konferencziya-oon/ [in Ukrainian].

16. Honcharuk, I.V., & Tomashuk, I.V. (2017). Vplyv ekoloho-ekonomichnoho faktoru na osoblyvosti orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu vykorystannia resursnoho potentsialu silskykh terytorii [The influence of the ecological and economic factor on the peculiarities of the organizational and economic mechanism of using the resource potential of rural areas]. Ekonomika, finansy, menedzhment: aktualni pytannia nauky i praktyky – Economy, finance, management: topical issues of science and practical activity, 4 (20), 52-62 [in Ukrainian].

17. Honcharuk, I.V., Babyna, O.M., & Yemchyk, T.V. (2021). Innovatsiino-investytsiina diialnist u rozvytku alternatyvnykh dzherel enerhii: faktory vplyvu [Innovative investment activity in the development of alternative energy sources: influencing factors]. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, 10, 144-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-10-144-151 [in Ukrainian].